GUEST POST- SHRUTI AGARWAL: NAME AT ODDS – KATIE PERRY VS KATY PERRY: SAGA OF TRADEMARKS
Lokesh Vyas -0
What happens when a name becomes the basis of a battle of identity, commerce, and creativity? This question lies at the heart of the dispute between the pop sensation Katy Perry, the famed ‘I Kissed a Girl’ singer, and a simple fashion designer, Katie Perry from Australia. In a...
Guest Post: Stuti Mehrotra: A Critical Analysis of the Corn Products Judgment: Overreliance on Phonetic Similarity and Monopolization within Trademark Classes
Lokesh Vyas -
1. Introduction
The decision in Corn Products Refining Co. v. Shangrila Food Products Ltd. remains one of the most pivotal judgments in the field of trademark law. In this case, the Court found that the trademark "Gluvita," registered by the defendant, was deceptively similar to "Glucovita" which is a mark...
Guest Post: Siddhant Sanghavi: To Register or Not to Register? The “CHUTIYARAM” Trademark Saga
Anushree Rauta -
The “CHUTIYARAM” trademark controversy has recently made headlines and with the Registry playing limbo, let’s take a deep dive into the absolute grounds of refusal as envisaged in the Trade Marks Act.
Here’s a quick summary of all that has happened:
In March 2025, a trademark application for the word...
Guest Post: Distinctiveness as the Bedrock of Trademark Rights: An Indian Perspective with Case Study Insights
Akshat Agrawal -
About Authors:
1. Ankith Kumar, specialised in IPR, is a practising advocate at Eshwars and Madras High Court
2. Harshita Jain, specialised in IPR and Technology Law, is a practicing corporate lawyer at Consultancy & Advisory firm.
INTRODUCTION
A distinctive mark is a trademark that possesses unique characteristics, enabling it to be easily...
Safe Harbour Upheld: Delhi HC Rules IndiaMart’s Use of ‘PUMA’ in Drop-Down Not Trademark Infringement
Savan Dhameliya -
Introduction
On 2nd June 2025, in the case of IndiaMart Intermesh Ltd. v. Puma SE, the Delhi High Court ruled on a trademark infringement dispute between the companies Puma SE (“Petitioner”) and IndiaMart Intermesh Limited (“IndiaMart”). The Division Bench of the Delhi High Court overruled the earlier order that was...
Guest Post: Rising Jurisprudence on Personality Rights in India: Deconstructing the overlap under Trademark Law
Anushree Rauta -
Introduction
The law of trademarks protects commercial symbols and signs appended to goods and/or services, including, but not limited to — a word, logo, number or device. Its twin purpose is to act as a source identifier for brands and help consumers distinguish the goods and/or services of one proprietor...
GUEST POST: “WHO GETS FIRST?”: THE CURIOUS BATTLE OF KENT CABLES AND KENT RO- BY CHHAVI TOKAS AND CHETAN NAGPAL
Anushree Rauta -
Background:
In a landmark judgment titled Kent Cables v. Kent RO, pronounced by Justice Jyoti Singh on May 30, 2023, the Delhi High Court permanently restrained Kent RO from manufacturing and selling fans under the trademark “KENT”. The court analyzed complex legal propositions and, based on prior use and goodwill,...





![Madras High Court restrains Lyca Productions from using the title ‘Karu’ for its film [READ ORDER]](https://iprmentlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/karu-356x220.jpg)









